HiFiMan Sundara Closed Review: A Disappointing Closed-Back?

The HiFiMan Sundara Closed headphones have generated significant controversy, with many reviews expressing disappointment. This review delves into the reasons behind this negative reception, challenging the common assumption that the closed-back version should simply mirror its open-back counterpart. We explore the significant design differences between the two models, focusing on the distinct driver and tuning choices that contribute to the Sundara Closed's unique—and often criticized—sound signature.Contrary to popular belief, simple EQ adjustments cannot rectify the fundamental flaws identified in this review. We analyze the inherent shortcomings in the Sundara Closed's frequency response, particularly the harsh treble, muddy midrange, and problematic transition between bass and lower mids. We assess whether these issues stem from a flawed initial design or unsuccessful attempts at post-production tuning, ultimately determining whether this closed-back headphone lives up to its name and the HiFiMan reputation.

Pros And Cons

HiFiMan Sundara Closed
  • Can be EQ'd to improve sound
  • Does not sound like a Sundara
  • Poor sound quality described as 'suffocating' and painful
  • Massive treble spike
  • Woolly mid-range and bass
  • Weird transition between bass and lower mids
  • Requires extensive, fine-grained EQ adjustments to be listenable
  • EQ adjustments may not be consistent across all units

Read more: EPZ P50 In-Ear Monitor Review: A Breakout Performer?

Misconceptions and Expectations

Many reviewers approach the HiFiMan Sundara Closed with preconceived notions, expecting it to sound like its open-back counterpart. This leads to unfair comparisons and negative reviews based on a flawed premise. The Sundara Closed isn't designed to be a direct clone; it's a separate closed-back headphone with its own tuning.

Another common misconception is that the Sundara Closed's shortcomings can be easily fixed with EQ. While some improvements can be made, the inherent flaws are more significant than simple adjustments can resolve. It's not a matter of fine-tuning a good foundation; the base product is flawed.

The reality is that the closed-back version uses an entirely different driver and design compared to the open-back version. This fundamental difference significantly impacts its sound signature and performance, invalidating direct comparisons.

Sound Quality Analysis

The Sundara Closed's sound quality is described as unpleasant, lacking in enjoyment and producing a sense of discomfort. A harsh treble spike and a muddy mid-range are key issues.

Screenshot illustrating the experiment with earcup removal and its negative outcome.
Screenshot illustrating the experiment with earcup removal and its negative outcome.

The reviewer highlights a bizarre mid-range feature and a peculiar transition between bass and lower mids, adding to the overall negative listening experience. These elements combine to create a sound profile described as painful and unredeemable.

The attempt to improve the sound by simply removing the earcups didn’t work; the frequency response became even worse, indicating fundamental design flaws within the driver itself.

EQ Adjustments and Limitations

While EQ can improve the Sundara Closed's sound, it requires extensive fine-grained adjustments to address numerous issues and tonal imbalances. This is not a simple bass boost or treble cut; it's complex and specific.

Screenshot displaying the presenter's EQ profile.
Screenshot displaying the presenter's EQ profile.

The EQ profile provided by the reviewer works well for their specific unit, but may not translate perfectly to other units due to variations in driver manufacturing. Fine-tuning is crucial and may require significant experimentation.

The fact that such extensive EQ is needed highlights the fundamental flaws in the headphone's original design and tuning. The need for extensive EQ does not negate the fact that the Sundara Closed is a fundamentally flawed headphone.

Driver Analysis and Conclusion

The Sundara Closed uses a different driver from the open-back Sundara, featuring a distinct design with horizontal profile and unique magnet configurations. This design differs from the open-back Sundara.

Close-up shot of the Sundara Closed's driver.
Close-up shot of the Sundara Closed's driver.

The reviewer suggests that the initial driver design may have been flawed, with subsequent tuning efforts aimed at mitigating the problems rather than creating a superior sound. The headphone performs better closed than it would open.

Comparison shot showcasing the differences in magnets between different HiFiMan headphones.
Comparison shot showcasing the differences in magnets between different HiFiMan headphones.

The overall conclusion is that the HiFiMan Sundara Closed is a poorly performing headphone despite some attempts to improve the original design. While EQ can help, the fundamental flaws are too significant to overlook. It's a headphone that falls short of expectations and is not recommended for purchase.