Choosing the right earphones can be overwhelming, with countless models boasting impressive specs. This guide cuts through the marketing hype and provides a detailed, scientific approach to comparing earphones, ensuring accurate and reliable reviews. We move beyond subjective opinions, outlining a methodology that minimizes bias and allows for objective analysis of sound quality and performance. This isn't just about listening – it's about measuring, calibrating, and meticulously controlling variables to ensure a fair comparison.This comprehensive guide explains the essential tools and techniques necessary for accurate earphone comparisons. We'll walk you through the process of setting up a calibrated testing environment, using both objective measurements and subjective listening tests. Learn how to use a sound level meter, test tones, and audio interfaces to quantify differences in sensitivity, impedance, and frequency response. We’ll also cover essential aspects of subjective listening, emphasizing the importance of controlled conditions and detailed note-taking to achieve reliable and insightful reviews.
Read more: EPZ P50 In-Ear Monitor Review: A Breakout Performer?
Essential Equipment and Preparation
Accurate earphone comparisons require specific tools. You'll need a tablet or smartphone with a free dB SPL measuring app (many are available). Ensure the app is calibrated correctly for consistent readings. A high-quality microphone is also essential for capturing accurate sound levels. Additionally, if you're comparing multiple earphones simultaneously, a splitter such as the Headamp 6 Pro, with its multiple channels, is highly beneficial.
You'll also need a test signal. The speaker uses audio files from Media College which provides various frequencies (1kHz, 250Hz, 441kHz, 10kHz) in WAV or MP3 formats. WAV is preferred for its higher fidelity. The choice of frequency is crucial. The speaker recommends 440Hz due to minimal variances and more stable readings than lower (bass-heavy) or higher (treble) frequencies.
Calibration and Measurement Technique
Before comparing earphones, calibrate your setup. The speaker uses a DAP (Digital Audio Player) to play test tones at a consistent volume (77dB) using the chosen test signal. This establishes a baseline for accurate comparisons. The speaker uses an Onyx DAP for its ease of use. The test tone level is meticulously monitored during playback.
Once the baseline is set for one earphone, the process is repeated for the second set. Crucially, the same cable and ear tips (in this case, Spinfit CP100 or Plus) are used for both to eliminate variables. Differences in sound pressure level (SPL) readings indicate variations in the earphone's sensitivity and impedance, offering insights into their ease of drive.
Any differences in volume level (dB SPL) between the two earphones reflect their inherent characteristics. For example, if one requires a higher volume setting to achieve 77dB, it suggests a lower sensitivity or higher impedance.
Direct Comparison & A/B Testing
Alternatively, using an audio interface instead of a DAP eliminates DAP-specific volume differences. The speaker uses an audio interface with a splitter, allowing direct A/B comparison of each earphone connected to individual channels. The volume output to each earphone is precisely adjusted using the audio interface's gain controls. This method bypasses any potential inconsistencies caused by varying DAPs.
Each earphone is individually adjusted to reach 77dB SPL using the same test audio file, directly through the audio interface, eliminating any factors associated with using a separate DAP. The same test file loaded from the audio interface is used on each channel to prevent inconsistencies.
Subjective Listening and Note-Taking
After achieving consistent volume levels, the speaker begins subjective listening. Using the same calibrated setup for both earphones, they listen to a variety of music tracks from their library, taking detailed notes on aspects like soundstage, detail, bass response, and overall sound quality. The focus is on identifying subtle differences in sound signature between the two sets of earphones.
This involves careful attention to frequency response, paying particular attention to common areas of discrepancy like bass, mids, and treble. The speaker anchors their comparison around the 400-800 Hz range due to its relatively stable response across most earphones, reducing the influence of variations in other frequency bands.
Conclusion: A Rigorous Approach to Earphone Reviews
This detailed methodology ensures a fair and accurate comparison, reducing the influence of external factors on subjective assessments. By carefully controlling variables such as volume, cables, and ear tips, the reviewer can isolate the inherent sonic characteristics of each earphone. This rigorous process is crucial for providing informed and trustworthy reviews.
The process emphasizes the importance of precise calibration and consistent testing conditions for unbiased comparisons. By standardizing various aspects of the testing setup, the reviewer can isolate the differences between the earphones and make a more informed judgment.
